Persuasion: Insights from the Self-Validation Hypothesis
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article describes the basic mechanisms underlying persuasion highlighting the role of a recently discovered new process—called self-validation. Unlike previous mechanisms in attitude change that focus on primary or first-order cognition, this new process emphasizes secondary or meta-cognition. The key notion of self-validation is that generating thoughts is not sufficient for them to have an impact on judgment. Rather, one must also have confidence in them. We review research revealing that this new mechanism can account for some already established outcomes in persuasion, but by a different process than postulated previously, as well as for some new findings. Specifically, we describe how source (e.g., credibility), recipient (e.g., bodily responses), message (e.g., matching), and context (e.g., repetition) variables can influence persuasion by affecting thought-confidence. We also describe how establishing a basic mechanism such as self-validation can provide a novel framework for understanding a variety of additional phenomenon in the domain of persuasion and beyond.
منابع مشابه
Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis.
Previous research in the domain of attitude change has described 2 primary dimensions of thinking that impact persuasion processes and outcomes: the extent (amount) of thinking and the direction (valence) of issue-relevant thought. The authors examined the possibility that another, more meta-cognitive aspect of thinking is also important-the degree of confidence people have in their own thought...
متن کاملOvert head movements and persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
The authors report 3 experiments that examine a new mechanism by which overt head movements can affect attitude change. In each experiment, participants were induced to either nod or to shake their heads while listening to a persuasive message. When the message arguments were strong, nodding produced more persuasion than shaking. When the arguments were weak, the reverse occurred. These effects...
متن کاملThe effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
The present research proposes that sources in the numerical majority (vs. minority) can affect persuasion by influencing the confidence with which people hold their thoughts in response to the persuasive message. Participants received a persuasive message composed of either strong or weak arguments that was presented by a majority or a minority source. Consistent with the self-validation hypoth...
متن کاملEase of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis
Three studies are reported examining a new explanation for ease of retrieval effects in persuasion. In each study, participants read a persuasive communication and were induced to generate either a low or high number of favorable or unfavorable thoughts in response. In conflict with the assumptions of most previous studies, the authors predicted and found that ease of retrieval effects occur pr...
متن کاملHappiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
The present research introduces a new mechanism by which emotion can affect evaluation. On the basis of the self-validation hypothesis (R. E. Petty, P. Briñol, & Z. L. Tormala), the authors predicted and found that emotion can influence evaluative judgments by affecting the confidence people have in their thoughts to a persuasive message. In each study, participants first read a strong or weak ...
متن کامل